|
Suggested standards for the use of comments on blood glucose results (non-pregnant, non diabetic) |
|
Monday, 31 March 2008 21:39 |
|
Suggested standards for the use of comments on blood glucose results – (non-pregnant, non diabetic patients)
- Recommendations should be given on the significance of results in line with guidelines from WHO/JBS2.
- If comments are given they should be modified for inpatients.
- There should be differentiation between random and fasting glucose samples.
- Laboratories should ensure that GP reporting systems indicate whether the sample is random or fasting and the sample time shoud be available.
- The laboratory report should indicate whether the sample is random or fasting.
- Any stated glucose level at which DM is considered to be excluded should be evidence based.
- Any stated glucose level at which a glucose tolerance test is recommended
should be evidence based (10 laboratories used 6.1-6.9 mmol/l).
- Comments should be provided on random glucose results and should be related to the glucose level.
- Comments should be provided on all fasting glucose results and should be related to the glucose level. In patients with impaired fasting glycaemia (consensus range 6.1-6.9 mmol/l) a GTT should be recommended.
- All comments should be evidence based.
- Laboratories should have critical limits for phoning abnormal results in line with RC Path guidelines.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 07 April 2010 08:08 |